Posts Tagged 'communications'

These Days Everyone Can Be A Communicator…But Is That Enough?

By Bruce Trachtenberg, Executive Director, The Communications Network and Michael Hamill Remaley, Vice President of Communications & Public Policy, Philanthropy New York

(This post originally appeared on PhilanTopic, the Philanthropy News Digest blog, on January 6, 2012 and is reprinted with permission.)

These days, everyone is a communicator. After all, how hard is it to send a tweet, post to a blog, or even shoot and upload a video?

Many people in charge of foundation and nonprofit communications have taken advantage of this trend by encouraging others in their organizations to develop and share content through online social networks.

Indeed, as they increasingly see that their messaging can be amplified by many voices, both on staff and off, one can imagine foundations asking: Do we still need professional communicators on staff? Why can’t we all just say what we have to say? In a world of decentralized distribution of news and ideas, do we even need a communications department? Continue reading…

Beyond the IRS: Communicating Your Foundation’s 990-PF

By Gail Fuller, Director of Communications, Rockefeller Brothers Fund

Long ago, foundations were in what I call “The Lone Ranger” mode: they hid behind masks, addressed societal needs, and for the most part never revealed who they were or told their stories or that of their grantees. By the 1980s, that began to change. The late Frank Karel, who created what is today considered foundation communications, concluded that a sound communications strategy is guided by the relentless pursuit of answers to three deceptively simple questions: 1) What do you want to accomplish?, 2) Who has to think or act differently for that to happen?, and 3) What would prompt them to do it?

Those are the same questions that also drive good grantmaking. And with that simple way of thinking, foundations began to be strategic about their communications and tell their stories, both externally with annual reports (and eventually websites), and with internal communications to trustees and staff.
Continue reading…

Don’t Say “When Did You Stop Caring About Children?” and Other Guidance for Child Advocates

By Douglas Gould
President, Douglas Gould and Company

As state budget deficits and competition for resources mount, child advocacy groups and their funders across the country face immense challenges in mobilizing support to preserve funding for basic services and structures designed to improve the lives of disadvantaged children and youth. But even as they fight the good fight, recent research suggests that many of the messages they use and the litany of data reporting on seemingly intractable problems are hurting rather than helping their efforts.

For example, a message such as “Parents need to test their homes for lead paint” places responsibility solely on parents and makes the role of the community invisible. Our recent research shows this does not inspire support for public, systemic solutions. However, a message of “Because our community lacks adequate structures to detect and rid buildings of lead that can poison children, too many develop learning problems that hold them back” is an approach that builds individual awareness and collective responsibility.
Continue reading…

Commentary: “Visibility” and Corporate Foundations

A goal of Smart Assets is to present ideas and develop discussions about issues in philanthropy. Those issues can be sensitive or volatile. While we want to encourage a space where people can openly say what they want, an occasional commentator may feel uncomfortable about writing under his or her own name. This is one such case, and the writer has chosen to remain anonymous.
Continue reading…

Philanthropy As “Invisible Aid”

Charles Hamilton

By Charles H. Hamilton
Senior Fellow, Philanthropy New York

Philanthropy was once described as “invisible aid.” Whatever Walter Gifford meant at the time (he was President of AT&T and Chair of the Organization on Unemployment Relief in the early 1930s), foundations and their work remain too “invisible.” If we don’t redress what makes philanthropy invisible, we cannot protect its unique role or legitimately participate in the public discourse about the challenges in this society.

I thought of this recently when I decided to read all of the profiles in the “30 Grants in 30 Days” section of Philanthropy New York’s website. There are now 32 profiles of “exemplary philanthropic initiatives.” (I decided not to name names, because I am interested in themes, but of the many good profiles, I would single out the New York Foundation and the Rauch Foundation as among the best.)

First, there are several senses in which philanthropy arguably should be invisible aid:
Continue reading…


About Our Blog

This is a forum for Philanthropy New York members to discuss issues affecting our sector and the practice of philanthropy.

Subscribe To Our Blog

Share This

Bookmark and Share

Categories

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.